For my 60th anniversary Jubilee Tourney, 126 studies were submitted, by 81
composers from 29 countries. The average quality was high; over three quarters
at least had something fresh, witty or deep - and many were simply beautiful.
At times, when I went over all those vastly different
concoctions, I felt like a vaudeville impresario, judging hopeful fire-eaters,
tap dancers, knife throwers, stand-up comedians, human cannonballs, unicyclists,
all showing their acts, hoping to be in the show. Often, I was truly moved by
the dazzling and crazy acts they had devised, their belief in them, the endless
practising that had obviously gone into them - but mainly, I was just awed.
Chess is inexhaustable, and the study composers' imagination and ingenuity is
inexhaustable. I am grateful to them.
I also want to thank tourney director René Olthof and
fellow jury member Harold van der Heijden. For some twenty years, I have known
both as kindred souls; lovers of the unusual, and especially the beautiful in
chess.
Only when I saw the original manuscripts, some with
solutions in hardly legible handwritten cyrillic; in enigmatic notations;
without variations or with an almost sickening plenitude of them, I knew how
much work René had done - just to get all the studies uniformly and anonymously
to Harold and me.
Harold, with his vast knowledge, his famous database and
his eagle's eye as an analyst, hopefully kept us from awarding studies that are
not entirely new or correct - but his artistic appreciation was what really
mattered.
That endgame composition is a form of art, and therefore
a matter of taste, was rather shockingly illustrated by the differences in our
initial selections - when we showed each other our first top-9's, not a single
study was in both of them. It was great fun, and very enlightening, to explain
to each other, in lengthy e-mails, the merits and shortcomings of individual
studies. Harold insisted that it was 'my' tourney and that therefore I had to
speak the final word, but even if his own ranking would have been different in
a few places, we both like the one that is presented here, and he influenced it
greatly.
When René finally gave us the names, we discovered we had
turned down quite a few celebrities, and had awarded two newcomers, Van Essen
and Bichu, highly. The winner of the tourney, the New Zealander Emil
Melnichenko, has been a renowned study composer for over a quarter
century, winning many prizes.
This final award does not differ from the provisional
one; the claims that came in only necessitated a few minor remarks.
Studies not in the final award are at the disposal of the authors.
Amsterdam, 13 April / 9 August 2003
Tim Krabbé
Harold van der Heijden (FIDE-judge for endgame studies)
First Prize: Emil Melnichenko (New Zealand)
With a very witty sacrificial manoeuvre, which repeats itself on a neighbour
file as an echo-chameleon, White obtains successive vacating checks for two
rooks. Finally g7 is vacated by a promotion, leading to a winning rook plus
pawn vs. rook endgame.
The construction, with only 12 pieces, is perfect. The
thematical try 1.Bd7+, when a third version of White's vacating manoeuvre is
refuted by a drawing version of the rook endgame, adds to the unity. By virtue
of the echoes, this study is the culmination point of an idea that Melnichenko
had been working on for twenty years
Remarkably, the composer seems to have tried to obscure
the beauty of his masterpiece by using an obscure notation system for the
approximately 1200 moves of his, often repetitive, analysis. It took the
tourney director many hours to turn this labyrinth into a PGN-file, and the
jury to get a clear view of the path from entrance to exit.
The reward was great.
White to play and win
Black threatens mate. In order to win, White must vacate g7. This calls for a
check by the Rg8, which calls for a check by Rf8 - which calls for a line-opening
bishop sacrifice.
1.Bb7+! Why 1.Bd7+ doesn't work will be explained later.
If Black does not capture a bishop now, White will have less trouble liberating the
North-East corner. There are two variations.
a) 1...Kxc7 2.Rc8+ Kb6 3.Rc6+ After 3...Kxb7 4.Rb8+ Kxc6 5.g8Q Nf8+ 6.Kg7 Rxg6+
7.Kxf8 Ne6+ 8.Qxe6+ Rxe6 9.Kf7 White wins the rook ending. The thematic
defence is
3...Kb5 when Black hides behind the white pieces. A strange hunt develops:
4.Ba6+ Ka5 5.Rc5+ Ka4 6.Bb5+ Kb4 7.Rc4+ Kb3 8.Ba4+ Ka3 9.Rc3+ Ka2
10.Bb3+ Kb2 11.Rc2+ Kb1 12.Ba2+ Ka1 13.Rc1+ This could go on forever, if not for the edge of the board:
13...Kxa2 14.Ra8+ followed by 15.g8Q, and White wins.
b) 1...Kxb7 2.Rb8+ Kc6 3.Rb6+ and now the dark-squared bishop joins the hunt:
3...Kc5 (or 3...Kxc7 4.Rc8+ Kxb6 5.g8Q and White wins)
4.Bd6+ Kd5 5.Rb5+ Kd4 6.Bc5+ Kc4 7.Rb4+ Kc3 8.Bd4+ Kd3 9.Rb3+ Kd2 10.Bc3+ Kc2
11.Rb2+ Kc1 12.Bd2+ Kd1 13.Rb1+ and Rg8 finally gets its check.
The thematical try
1.Bd7+?does not work, because after
1...Kxd7! the black king gets too close:
2.Rd8+ Kc6 3.Rd6+ If Black tries to hide now, White wins as above, but Black draws with
3...Kxc7! 4.Rc8+ Kxd6 5.g8Q After 5.Rd8+ Ke7! both promotions only draw;
6.g8Q Nf8+ 7.Kg7 Rxg6+ etc., or 6.g8N+ Kxd8 7.Nxh6 Nf8
5...Nf8+ 6.Kg7 Rxg6+ 7.Kxf8 Ne6+ 8.Qxe6+ Kxe6 and now the rook ending is a draw.
NB 16 April: As Rik van der Heiden shows, Black can last one move longer if
in the main variation after 1.Bb7+, he plays 1...Kd7(!) when White has nothing
better than 2.Rd8+ Kxc7 3.Rc8+, reverting to the position after 2.Rc8+
Second Prize: Martin van Essen (Netherlands)
Two rooks up, White is in for a ferocious sacrificial struggle to keep Black
from promoting. Both sides take part in the slugfest: Proke-manoeuvre with
double rook sacrifice on f4 by White; self-blocking bishop sacrifice on a
promotion square and unguarded guard with Novotny by Black. The black king
must undertake a Long March to f3 where his proud passed pawns only help
in the tragicomical but beautiful way in which he is mated.
The initial position, light but not too elegant,
has miraculously withstood all the computing power unleashed at it. In
those side variations, some more beautiful moves can be found.
An amazing work of art for a new composer.
White to play and win
1.e6+ Not 1.Nd3 e1Q+ 2.Nxe1 f2, or 1.Re4 e1Q+ 2.Rxe1 Bxe1+ 3.Kg5 bxa6
4.e6+ Bxe6 5.Rb7+ Kg8 6.Nxe6 Bc3 (6...f2 7.Rg7+ Kh8 8.Rf7) 7.Rd7 f2
8.Rd1 Kf7 9.Nd8+ Kg7 and the possibility of Bf6+ ensures Black a draw;
10.Nc6 Be1 11.Rd7+ with a perpetual.
1...Bxe6 2.Rxb7+ Kg6 3.f5+ Kxf5 Or 3...Bxf5 4.Rb6+ Kf7 5.Nd3!
4.Nd3 (4.Re4 Bd5!) Now Black loses after 4...e1Q+ 5.Nxe1 Bxe1+ 6.Kh3 Bxc4 7.Bxc4
and after 4...f2 5.Rc5+ Kf6 6.Nf4 f(e)1Q 7.Nh5+ Kg6 8.Bd3+ Kh6 9.Rxh7 mate,
but he has the unlikely
4...Be1+! Blocking his own promotion square. 4...e1Q+ 5.Nxe1 Bxe1+ 6.Kh3 Bxc4 7.Bxc4
leads to a slow but inevitable death.
5.Nxe1 f2 It seems the other pawn will promote. But:
6.Rf4+! Kxf4 Now after 7.Ng2+? Kf3 Black would win, as b7 is blocked.
Vacating this square is worth a rook.
7.Rxb4+ The pawns' fate seems sealed now: 7...Kf5 8.Bd3+ Kf6 9.Rf4+ or 7...Ke3
8.Nc2+ Kd2 9.Rd4+ followed by Bxe2.
7...Bc4! The last resort - an unguarded guard (also a Novotny) to close the diagonal a6-e2.
8.Rxc4+ Kf5 9.Rf4+! After two bishop sacrifices by Black, now a second rook sacrifice by White, to
open the diagonal again.
9...Kxf4 10.Ng2+ Kf3 To prevent Bxe2. But now:
11.Bb7
with a fairy tale mate in which, except for pawn h7, all remaining pieces cooperate.
Third Prize: Jarl Ulrichsen (Norway)
Natural position; crystal clear story, governed by one theme: the prevention
of promotions. With two unguarded guards, White uses Black's ingenious
anti-promotion struggle for an even more ingenious anti-promotion manoeuvre
of his own. The paradoxical journey of the white king from a5 by c8 to d5,
to stop pawn h5, makes one think of Réti.
White to play and draw
1.a7 Seems winning.
1...Be1+ 2.Kb5 c6+ 3.Kc5 Nxd3+ 3...Bf2+? 4.d4 and White wins.
4.Kd6 Bg3+ 5.f4! Mysterious, for the moment. After 5.Kxd7 Nc5+ 6.Kd8 Ne6+ 7.Kc8 Nc7, Black wins.
5...Bxf4+ 6.e5! Bxe5+ 7.Kxd7 Nc5+ 8.Kc8 Again: 8.Kd8 Ne6+ 9.Kc8 Nc7 and Black wins.
8...Nxa4 9.Kxb7 Nb6 10.Kxb6 Bd4+ 11.Kxc6 Bxa7 Finally, the dangerous pawn has been caught.
12.Kxd5 Suddenly, it is clear what White has been doing: with 5.f4 and
6.e5, he used Black's clearance of the diagonal to b8, to clear the
diagonal he needed to stop pawn h5.
Fourth Prize: Gady Costeff (Israel / USA)
Brilliant final position with a triple-pin stalemate, after a baffling
rook-promotion. Play, from an initial position that looks remarkably like the
First Prize, somehow lacks unity - or perhaps we should applaud the composer
for finding an acceptable introduction to his beautiful idea at all. The fork
after 7...Bxg7+ 8.Kxg7 is a terrific joke, and it is amazing that after 7.Ng8,
Black cannot reach a winning database endgame of rook and bishop vs. two knights.
White to play and draw
1.Ne4+ Other moves spoil the promotion's strength, e.g. 1.Rc8+ Kxd2
2.f8Q Rh6+ 3.Kg8 Nf6+ 4.Kf7 Nh7+ 5.Ke8 Rxf8+ 6.gxf8Q Nxf8 7.Nf5 Rf6
8.Nxd6 Rxd6 9.Kxf8 g4 etc.
1...Kd4 2.Nxg5 Here, 2.Re8 Kxe4 3.f8Q Rh6+ 4.Kg8 Nf6+ 5.Kf7 Nh7+ 6.Nf5+ Kxf5
7.Qh8 Kg4+ 8.Kg8 Nf6+ 9.Kf7 Nxe8+ 10.Kxe8 Rxh8+ 11.gxh8Q Rf8+ loses.
2...Rh6+ 3.Nh7 Nf6 or 3...Be5 4.Rd8+ Ke4 5.Kg8 Bxg7 6.f8Q Bxf8 7.Nxf8 Rg2+ 8.Neg6 Nf4 9.Re8+ Kd5
10.Kg7 drawing - "at least until there is an 8-piece database," as the
composer drily remarks.
4.g8Q Nxg8 5.fxg8R! Be5+ 6.Rg7 Rxf8+ 7.Ng8 and Black cannot win. With a queen on g7 something like 7...Ra8
8.Qxe5+ Kxe5 9.Kg7 Rb6 would be possible, but now all pinning rook moves are
stalemate. After 7...Rf7 8.Nxh6 Bxg7+ 9.Kg8 Ra7 10.Nf5+ rescues the draw, and after
7...Bxg7+ 8.Kxg7 the king's fork on the two rooks also draws.
Special Prize: Dirk Borst (Netherlands)
Black creates an unusual Rambling Rook that can be captured without an
immediate stalemate. With a logical and beautiful manoeuvre consisting of
several phases, White silences this rook, and wins. A nice feature is that
both moves by pawn c7 each play their very different but crucial part in
the solution.
White to play and win
1.Bf5 1.Bd7+ to immediately get the pawn where White wants it, doesn't work:
1...c6 2.Bf5 Rh2! 3.Rh3 Qxh3!
1...Qh7+ Bd7 mate still being possible, 1...Rh2 could now be met by 2.Rh3! etc.
1...Qh7+ 2.Bxh7 Rxh7+ and after a future KxR, there follows c5, and the stalemate
cannot be lifted. To win, White must force c6+ and hide at b6. The forcing
however, can only be done with the black pawn on g5, and the hiding
only makes sense without it. These considerations govern White's
manoeuvre, but there are many pitfalls.
3.Kg6! g5 being taboo, only this will lure the Rambling Rook to the south of his
king, which is necessary to force c6+
3...Rh6+ 3...Rg7+ boils down to the same, but after 3...c5? 4.Rc2(1) White runs
to c3 and wins much faster.
4.Kf5 Rf6+ 5.Ke4 Re6+ After 5...Rf4+ 6.Kd5 White jumps to move 10.
6.Kd3 Rd6+ 7.Ke2 Not 7.Kc2? Rd2+ 8.Kb1 Rb2+ 9.Kc1 c5 and the white king is boxed in.
7...Rd2+ 8.Kf3 Rf2+ 9.Ke4 Rf4+ 10.Kd5 The crucial position. Without pawn g5, Black could now play
10...Rf5+, and White would not be able to make progress.
10...c6+ The only move. 10...Rd4+ 11.Kc5 c6 12.Rc1 loses immediately, and
after 10...c5 11.Rc1 Rd4+ 12.Ke5 White picks up g5, runs to c3 and wins;
12...Re4+ 13.Kf5 Rf4+ 14.Kg6 Rf6+ 15.Kh5 Rh6+ 16.Kxg5 Rg6+ 17.Kf4 Rf6+ 18.Ke3
11.Ke5 White cannot use the new hiding place right
away: after 11.Kc5? Rf3! draws, as the next step in the winning manoeuvre,
12.Rc2, is refuted by Rxg3 13.Kxc6 Rc3! For this rook endgame to be won, pawn g5
must vanish.
11...Re4+ 12.Kf5 Rf4+ White has slower wins, Black slower losses.
13.Kg6 Rf6+ 14.Kh5 Rh6+ 15.Kxg5 Rg6+ 16.Kf4 Again, White must force the rook to the south.
16...Rf6+ 17.Ke3 Re6+ 18.Kd2 Re2+ And now: to the hiding place.
19.Kd3 Rd2+ 20.Ke4 Rd4+ 21.Ke5 Re4+ 22.Kd6 Re6+ or Rd4+ 23.Kc5 Rd3 (23...Rxg4 24.Rgd3 Rg3 25.Kb6 c5 26.Rd5! Rxc3
27.Rxc5 Kxa3 28.Rxa5+ Kb4 29.c5) 24.Rg2 Rxc3 25.Kd4! Rxa3 26.c5 and wins.
23.Kc5 Re3 or Re5+ 24.Kb6 c5 (24...Re3 25.Rb3) 25.Rc1 Re6+ 26.Kxc5 Re5+ 27.Kd4 Re4+ 28.Kc3
24.Rg2 Rxc3 25.Kd4! (25.g5? Rg3)
25...Rxa3 26.c5 and White's g4-pawn decides.
First Honourable Mention: Jan Timman (Netherlands)
A clear and wittily told adventure, in a natural position. By choosing
the right way to put a rook on d1, and sacrificing it, White sets up a
promotion fork. A second rook sacrifice on the same square leaves Black
with the wrong check.
White to play and win
1.O-O-O! and not 1.Rd1.
1...cxd5 2.Rxd5+ Kc6 3.Rxc5+ Kxc5 4.f6+ Kc6 Not 4...Kxc4 5.f7 e6 6.fxe8Q Ba3+ 7.Kc2 Rxe8 8.Ne3 mate, nor 4...Kb6
5.c5+ followed by 6.f7 After 4...e5 5.f7 Bd6 it becomes clear why the
king had to go to c1 on move 1: 6.Nxe5! - now the knight is not pinned.
(6.Rxg7 Rgf8 7.fxe8Q Rxe8 8.Rxd7 is insufficient in both cases)
There follows 6...Rgf8 7.fxe8Q Rxe8 8.Nf7+ and the black bishop is lost:
8...Kc6 9.Rg6 Re6 10.Nd8+
5.Rc5+! To close the diagonal f8-a3. If immediately 5.f7 e6! draws. 6.Ne5+
(6.Nf6 gxf6 7.fxg8Q Ba3+ 8.Kc2 Rxg8) 6...Kb7 7.Kc2 Be7 8.Rxg7 Rgf8
9.fxe8Q Rxe8 10.Ng6 (10.Nxd7 Kc8) 10...Bd6 11.Rxd7+ Kc6 12.Rxa7 Rg8
and Black should be able to hold.
5...Kxc5 6.f7 and now, with the king on c5, Black must open the other diagonal:
6...g6 7.fxg8Q Bh6+ Which has a drawback:
8.Nxh6 Rxg8 9.Nxg8 and White wins.
Second Honourable Mention: Eduard Eilazyan (Ukraine)
Elegant gamelike position where White, carefully avoiding knight's
forks and an unguarded guard, eeks out a win. The rescue 9...Kd5 in
the variation after 4.Kg3 is especially beautiful.
White to play and win
1.b7 Nb8 2.Nd6+ Not immediately 2.Rc8 because of Rg8 3.Kh4 Kf4 4.Kh5 Ng4! 5.Rxg8 Nf6+
2...Kd5 or 2...Kf3 3.Rc3+ Kf4 4.Rc4+ Kf3
5.Rh4 Rd8 6.Rxh6 Rxd6 7.Rh8 Rxg6 8.Rf8+ Ke4 9.Rxb8 and White wins,
or 2...Ke5 3.Rc8 Rg8 4.Nf7+ Kd5 5.Nxh6 Rxg6 6.Nf7 Rb6 7.Rxb8 Kc6
8.Nd8+ Kd7 9.Ra8 Kc7 10.Rc8+ Kd7 11.b8Q and wins.
3.Rc8 Ng8+ (3...Rg8 4.Nf5!)
4.Kg2! The only good square. After 4.Kg3? Kxd6
5.Rxb8 Kc7 6.Rf8 Kxb7 7.Rf7+ Kc6 8.Rh7 Ne7 9.Rxh8 Kd5! White
loses the pawn. 4.Kg4 also doesn't win: 4...Kxd6 5.Rxb8 Nh(f)6+
4...Kxd6 5.Rxb8 Kc7 6.Rd8! After 6.Rf8? Kxb7 7.Rf7+ Ne7! 8.Rxe7+ Kc6
9.Kf3 Kd6 10.Ra7 Ke5, Black draws. White needs that knight to stay at g8.
6...Kxb7 7.Rd7+ Kc6 8.Rh7 Ne7 9.Rxh8 Nxg6 10.Rh6 and White wins.
Third Honourable Mention: Philippe Bichu (France)
With a square vacation and a quiet rook sacrifice, White meets a promotion
threat - with Black to choose whether a surprising perpetual or a
symmetrical queen's catch will do the job.
White to play and draw
1.g6! White needs g5 for his knight.
1...Bxg6 1...d1Q 2.gxh7 is not enough.
2.Kc4! Threatening mate by Rf6+ etc.
2...Bxf5 2...Kxf5 3.Nf1 d1Q 4.Ne3+ is a draw, as is 2...Bh5 3.Rf1 Be2+ 4.Kxd4 Bxf1 5.Ne3
3.Nf3 d1Q After 3...Bd3+ 4.Kxd4 d1Q 5.Ng5+! the new queen is
lost: 5...Kf5 6.Ne3+ or 5...Kd6 6.Nf7+ Kc6 7.Nd8+ Kb5 8.Nc3+ But now White has
a perpetual, e.g.
4.Ng5+ Ke5 5.Nf7+ Ke4 6.Ng5+ Ke5 7.Nf7+ Ke6 8.Ng5+ Kd6 9.Nf7+ Kc6
10.Nd8+ Kd6 11.Nf7+ etc.
Fourth Honourable Mention: Mario Matous (Czech Republic)
A Zugzwang duel between a bishop and a rook is decided when a black knight
must cause a surprise interference.
White to play and win
1.Ne5+ Kf6 2.Nd7+ Kg6 3.Be7 Kxh6 4.Nf8 Rg4 4...Ra5 5.Bf6 is mate, and after 4...Rxh4 5.Bxh4 the knight is lost.
5.Ba3! After 5.Bc5 Re4 (or Rg3 6.Bd4 Nf2 7.Bxf2 Rg8+ drawing) 6.Ba3 Re1
7.Bb4 Re2 8.Bc3 Rg2, the wrong side must move.
5...Rg1 or 5...Rc4 6.Bb2 Rc7 7.Bf6 Rh7+ 8.Kg8
6.Bb4 Rg2 After 6...Rd1 there follows 7.Bc3
7.Bc3 and the black knight must spoil the defense.
Fifth Honourable Mention: Andrey Visokosov (Russia) and Nikolay Mironenko
(Ukraine)
With a sharp introduction, White reaches an endgame of bishop against
rook plus two pawns which he can miraculously draw with the paradoxical 7.Kb4!
White to play and draw
1.c7 Rc6 2.Rg3+ Kh4 3.Bd7 Rxc7 4.Rg4+ Kh5 5.Rg7 Rhc6 6.Bxc6 Rxg7 7.Kb4! Sparing both pawns. 7.Kxa4 Rc7 8.Be4 Kg5 9.Kb4 Kf4 10.Bg6 Ke5 11.Kc3 Kd5 loses.
7...c3 Both after 7...Rc7 8.Bxa4 c3 9.Bc2 Kg4 10.Kb3 Kf4 11.Bg6 Ke3
12.Kc2 and 7...a3 8.Kxa3 Rc7 9.Be4 Kg5 10.Kb2 Kf4 11.Bg2 Ke5 12.Kc3 Kd6
13.Bf1 White reaches a theoretical draw.
8.Be8+ Kg5 9.Kxc3 But not 9.Bxa4 Rc7 10.Bc2 Kf4 11.Kb3 Ke3 12.Bg6 Kd2 and Black wins.
9...a3 10.Kb3 Ra7 11.Ka2 with a draw.
After a rook's homerun, with two bases touched for captures, a last try by
Black is refuted by the nice feint 8.Kg5.
White to play and draw
1.h8Q+ Rxh8 2.Rh1+ Kg2 3.Rxh8 bxa2 4.Ra8 a1Q 5.Rxa1 Bxa1 6.g5 Bxf6!
7.gxf6 Kh3 8.Kg5! The obvious 8.Ke5 loses after Kg4 9.Kxd5 Kxf5 10.Kd4 Kxf6 etc.
8...d4 8...Kg3 9.Kh6 d4 10.Kg7 d3 11.Kxf7 d2 12.Kg8 d1Q 13.f7 is also a draw
9.Kf4 Kh4 10.Ke4 Kg5 11.Kxd4 Kxf5 12.Ke3 Kxf6 13.Kf4 with a draw.
First Commended: Alexander Golubev (Russia)
After a witty tour, a knight takes revenge for a collegue,
repeating a family check on c5 with great benefit.
Golubev deserves a prize for the most beautifully sketched diagram.
White to play and win
1.e3+ Kc4 or 1...Ke4 2.Nf6+ Ke5 3.Ng4+ Ke4 4.d3+ winning the queen.
2.d3+ Kb4 3.Nc2+ Ka4 4.Nd4 Qxd3 5.Nc5+! Bxc5 6.Bd7+ Kb4 7.Nc6+ Ka4 After 7...Kb5 8.Ne5+ Kb6 9.Nxd3 Bxe3, White has a tedious but clear technical win.
8.Ne5+ 8.Nxa7+ Kb4 9.Nc6+ only loses time; both after 9...Kb5 10.Ne5+ Kb6 11.Nxd3 Bxe3
and 9...Ka4 10.Ne5+ the disappearance of Pa7 is without meaning.
8...Qb5 9.Nd3 Qxd7 b3 mate was threatened too. But now a second family check on c5 decides:
10.Nxc5+ and White wins.
Second Commended: Roger Missiaen (Belgium)
A dominated bishop is finally silenced by a knight's corner move.
White to play and win
White is two pieces up, but two pieces are en prise.
1.Nf4+ 1.Ng3+ Kf3 loses a piece.
1...Kf3 2.Nxd3! 2.Bc6+ Kxf4 3.Bc7 d2 4.Bxd6+ Ke3 5.Bc5+ Kf4 is a draw.
2...Nxb5 3.Nf6 Nd6 Or 3...Bg6 4.Bd8! followed by Ne5 winning a piece. 3...Ke2
4.Ne5 Nd6 5.Bc7 Nb5 6.Bb8 also loses the bishop.
4.Bc7 Nb5 5.Bb8 Bg6 6.Ne5+ Kf4 Now after 7.Nxg6+? Kg5 Black immediately wins the piece back, but
7.Nf7+! Ke3 8.Nh8! finally corners the bishop - White wins.
Third Commended: Luis Miguel Gonzalez (Spain)
A hard struggle for a back-rank mate, with the white pieces constantly
occupying squares guarded by pawns. The highlight is the striking 6.Rfd6.
White to play and win
1.Rxf6 1.Kf7? Ng4! but now Kf7 is a threat.
1...Kg8 2.c7 Rc6 Or 2...Ra8 3.Nxd6 and now 3...e(g)xf6 4.Nc8! or 3...h2 4.Ne4 Rbb8 5.cxb8Q+ Rxb8 6.Rf1
3.Nxd6 Rxc7 4.Ne8 4.Rf7 exd6 5.Rxc7 d5+ 6.Kg5 a2 will be a draw.
4...Rac6 5.Rd8 Rc8 and now
6.Rfd6! and mate soon, e.g.
6...Rxd8 7.Nf6+ exf6 8.Rxd8 mate
Fourth Commended: Mario Matous (Czech Republic)
Avoiding two stalemate traps, White delivers a beautiful three bishop mate.
White to play and win
1.h7 Not 1.Be6+ Ka3 2.h7 Qb1+
1...Qh1+ 2.Kb6 Qxh4 3.h8Q Qxg4 is a draw; White must save his Bg4. 3.Bd1+ Kc4 doesn't work, so:
3.Be6+ Ka3 4.h8B! 4.h8Q? Qxd4+ 5.Qxd4 is stalemate. Now, both 5.Bc5+ and Bb2+ are threatened.
4...Qg5 5.Bb2+! Avoiding 5.Bc5+? Qxc5+ 6.Kxc5 when Black would be stalemated after all.
5... Kb4 6.Bhc3 with a beautiful mate.
Fifth Commended: Iuri Akobia (Georgia)
Creating a hiding place for his king, White stops the passed pawns,
and reaches a database draw where he seems to run in the wrong direction.
White to play and draw
1.Rxf6! Other tries leave Black with a decisive material advantage, e.g.
1.Rc7 g3 2.c6 g2 3.cxd7 Rd1 4.Rb8 Rb1+ or 1.Rc8 g3 2.c6 g2 3.cxd7 Rd1
4.d8Q Rxd8 5.Rxd8 g1Q 6.Rc6 Kxg6 or 1.Rd6 g3 2.Rd2 g2 3.Rxg2 Rxg2
4.Kxc4 Rc2+ 5.Kd5 Kxg6
1...g3 2.c6 dxc6+ 3.Kxc6 c3 4.Rf5+ Kh6 5.Rc5 g2
6.Rxc3 Rh1 7.Rg3 g1Q 8.Rxg1 Rxg1 9.Kd5 Rxg6 and now only
10.Rb1! draws. There could follow:
10...Rg4 11.Rh1+ Kg6 12.Ke5 Kg5 13.Ke6 g6 14.Kf7 Rf4+ 15.Kg7 with a draw.
Sixth Commended: Yochanan Afek (Israel)
The improbable 5.Ra4+, a check-provoking rook sacrifice while Black
threatens everything, is a true gem, and the resulting perpetual is nice.
Black to move; White draws
1...d2+ If 1...b2, then 2.Ra4+! Black wants to capture with check.
2.Kf1 e2+ 3.Kxe2 d1Q+ 4.Kxd1 After 4.Qxd1 Bh5+ 5.Kd2 Bxd1 6.Rc5 b2 7.Rxa5+ Ba4 8.Nb5+ Kb3 9.Nd4+ Kc4
10.Rxa4+ Kd5 11.Rxa2 b1Q Black must win.
4...b2 5.Ra4+! Even now.
5...Bxa4+ 6.Kd2 bxa1Q 7.Nc4+ Kb3 8.Nxa5+ Kb2 9.Nc4+ Kb1 10.Na3+ Kb2 11.Nc4+
etc., drawing.